The Royal Crown Enterprise System is a vehicle for implementing structure and strategy into both business and personal operations. This universally applicable formula outlines a step by step process maximizing the potential for desired outcomes. Given the formula’s extreme detail and complexity, a general explanation is as follows: All things including laws and regulations are designed and built upon a series of fundamental elements, the combination of which composes the unitary whole. “IRAC” (issue, rule, analysis, conclusion), the analytical thought process commonly taught in law school, is the mechanism to which the attorney identifies those underlying “rules” or “elements.” After such identification, these elements are compared to and analyzed with the particular facts and circumstances of the given situation, ultimately dictating the scenario’s conclusion. In applying this method of legal reason, the RC Enterprise System places a client’s business objective as the ultimate issue. Together, we identify and analyze each and every potential element that is relevant to and included within the client’s objective. The process is continued until all potential elements or variables are

broken down and understood at their most fundamental level.


The firm believes in turning challenges into opportunities through the unique combination of ambition, creativity, and innovation. In addition to the traditional practice of law, the firm applies a calculated and strategic approach to client matters through what the firm has trademarked as the Royal Crown Enterprise System. We take a truly novel approach to business enterprise and our unwavering focus always places the client’s best interest as the top priority.


We then analyze the facts and circumstances of the scenario which are already accepted as true. Through deductive reasoning, we place the variables in the form of an equation of which the most desirable outcome depends upon. Once we develop the initial equation, the IRAC analysis is continued to account for the universal laws of cause and effect, polarity, gestation and relativity. Given the facts of the client objective, what will cause the effect of our most desirable resolution? What are the risk factors contingent upon such result? Of the negative variables or risk factors present, what is their polar opposite and how do we develop the necessary change from where we are now and what we want in the future? How can we relate the desired outcome to the objective’s current position? Once again, we apply the IRAC analysis to each “sub-issue” continuously until all categorical variables are broken down and understood at a fundamental level. The process becomes comprehensive and from this position, we reproduce the initial equation with a calculated precision. The result becomes a strategic business plan and operational model. Relating the client’s objective to the principles of mathematics propagates a system for producing consistency and validity. The combined use of legal reason, deductive logic and mathematical principles provides a superfluous yet indubitable formulaic model for achieving success. At this point, we understand the capacity for accomplishing the client objective as well as the obstruction acting to vitiate its realization. Once again, we apply legal reason and deductive logic to pin point and minimize such obstruction with strategic calculation thereby maximizing the vitality of a successful outcome through positive action. In addition to presenting the objective in the form of a comprehensive equation, the use of syllogistic reasoning uncovers a step by step blue-print for efficient execution of the client’s goals.